California DUI Attorney, Matthew Ruff ☎️ Call Toll Free 1-877-212-2090

Matthew Ruff Top Rated California DUI Attorney

Matthew Ruff defends clients charged with alcohol related DUI and DUID, both for prescription drugs and marijuana Serving Sou

Free Consultation

☎️ Call: 661-243-1084

Signed in as:

filler@godaddy.com

Account

DUI Attorney Matthew Ruff Reaches Top 1% Status

Matthew Ruff Awarded “Top 1%” National Status

Breaking News: DUI Defense Attorney Matthew Ruff Reaches Elite "Top 1%" National Status

We are thrilled to announce a monumental milestone for the Law Offices of Matthew Ruff. Prominent Southern California DUI defense attorney Matthew Ruff has officially been recognized as one of America’s Most Honored Lawyers for 2026, achieving the absolute pinnacle of legal recognition: The Top 1%.

As displayed on his newly awarded commemorative plaque, this prestigious national accolade is certified by The American Registry and represents continuous professional excellence.

What Does the Top 1% Distinction Mean?

This is not just another industry award. While previously recognized in the Top 5% of American Professionals, Matthew Ruff's elevation to the Top 1% in 2026 marks a rare tier of achievement.

To qualify for this distinction, The American Registry conducts a rigorous, comprehensive vetting process of lawyers nationwide. The honor is reserved only for those who have secured:

Significant mentions and analysis in the press.

Elite honors and accolades from recognized legal trade groups.

Acclaimed, top-tier peer reviews from fellow attorneys.

Unprecedented ratings and positive feedback from actual clients.

A Proven Legacy of Fighting for the Accused

Known across Southern California and by his peers as a "Master of DUI Defense," Matthew Ruff has spent over three decades protecting the constitutional rights, freedom, and driving privileges of his clients.

Based in Torrance, California, his practice is 100% dedicated to DUI and criminal defense. Whether it is exposing flaws in police procedures, executing complex pre-trial motions, or securing massive "Set Aside" victories at DMV Administrative Per Se (APS) hearings, this award reflects a career defined by unmatched results and tireless advocacy.

This latest honor joins an already decorated mantle for 2026, including his recent designation as a Martindale-Hubbell Gold Client Champion, further solidifying that his sharp legal acumen is backed by authentic client satisfaction.

DUI Attorney Matthew Ruff Named “Top 1%” Nationally

15 Minute Observation Defense Wins Case

Matthew Ruff Exposes Violation of Title 17, Wins DUI Case

Master of DUI Defense Matthew Ruff wins case by showing 15 minute observation was not done in a DUI arrest, violating Title 17.

In a significant win for the defense, the California Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) has issued a Set Aside Order, overturning a pending driver's license suspension. This decision followed a formal Administrative Per Se hearing where the evidence presented by the defense successfully challenged the reliability of the state's chemical test results.

Case Overview

• Arrest Date: October 07, 2001

• Location: Atascadero, California

• Initial Charge: Violation of 23152 VC (Driving Under the Influence)

• Reported BAC: .17% and .17%

• Outcome: License Suspension SET ASIDE

The Defense Strategy: Challenging Title 17 Compliance

The cornerstone of this victory was the cross-examination of the arresting officer by Top Rated DUI Defense Attorney Matthew Ruff regarding Title 17 requirements, which govern the procedures for administering breath tests in California.

Key Findings of Fact:

• Lack of Continuous Observation: Although the officer signed official documentation (DS-367) claiming compliance with Title 17, testimony revealed that there was no continuous observation of the respondent for the required 15 minutes prior to the breath test.

• Procedural Gaps: Evidence showed that during the critical window between the arrest (2117 hrs) and the breath test (2127 hrs), the officer was occupied with securing the vehicle and transporting the respondent, making continuous observation impossible.

• Officer Admissions: Under questioning, the officer testified that he did not actually know what the Title 17 requirements were for a breath test.

The DMV's Decision

Based on these procedural failures, the DMV Driver Safety Officer determined that the breath test results were not reliable.

"It is determined that the preponderance of evidence in this case supports that Respondent was not driving a motor vehicle at the time that the concentration of alcohol in his blood was at or above 0.08%." — B. Crowell, Driver Safety Officer

Why Experience Matters

This case highlights why Top Tier Attorney Matthew Ruff wins DUI cases. A meticulous review of police procedure and a deep understanding of forensic requirements can lead to a successful outcome, even when initial blood alcohol readings appear high. By exposing the lack of continuous observation, the defense was able to protect the client's driving privileges and restore their standing with the Department of Motor Vehicles. This case is representative of the hundreds of cases has won. Matthew beats high BAC cases by showing failed compliance with California CCR Title 17.

Defense Counsel: Matthew Ruff, Attorney at Law

Matthew Ruff Saves License By Showing Failure to Follow Title 17, 15 minute observation

Matthew Ruff Wins DUI Case

About Matthew Ruff

Matthew Ruff Has The Experience To Beat Your DUI

Matthew Ruff has defended thousands of DWI cases over the last there decades, this experience gives his clients a distinct advantage. We know that the process can sometimes be overwhelming. We are dedicated to providing you help in language that you can understand. If you don't feel like you understand your options, just ask, and we will

Top DUI Lawyer Matthew Ruff has been recognized year after year as being in the Top 5 Percent of Lawyers nationwide.
Knowing the science and training that police get makes all the difference! Matt is trained to dismantle the FST observations made by the officer, he knows the official standards and uses this against the cop on cross examination.

Anyone arrested for drinking and driving has many questions about their case, such as why did the officer waive a pen or his finger in front of my face? This “test” is known as the Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus or HGN test. The purpose is to detect any jerking or bouncing of the eyes which can indicate a presence of alcohol in the subject’s bloodstream. The problem with the test is that it is often administered incorrectly by police officers. Matt has the same training as most officers and can spot deficiencies in the testing process.

Matthew is a Top Tier Defense Lawyer with offices throughout California. So, for example if you need a lawyer in Torrance or a DUI Attorney in Long Beach CA, Matthew is here to help.

If you are looking for a DUI Attorney in Santa Clarita Matthew is also here to help. With over 3 decades of “in the trenches “ experience, Matthew is referred to as the Master of DUI Defense by his peers and those in the judicial system. Why does Matthew Ruff win DUI cases ? The answer is simple, he fights to protect the rights of his clients and demands the prosecution meet its burden of proof in every case he defends.

Show Less

A Focus on Results

Matthew Ruff Has The Experience To Beat Your DUI

Getting arrested for DUI can be very scary and traumatic. Matthew has the experience, knowledge and connections to turn the process into one in which you have control. The first step is for us to work with you and come up with a plan to get the results you need. Many lawyers focus on pleading you guilty or no contest, we focus on getting

Our goal is to get you the results you need to save your driver's license and keep your criminal record clean.

Show Less

We Focus on Getting DUI Charges Dismissed!

Matthew Ruff Has The Experience To Beat Your DUI

We Focus on Getting DUI Charges Dismissed!

Don't wait! Contact Matt for a free phone consultation. California law requires anyone arrested for DUI to demand a hearing in order to save your driving privileges, even if you don’t have a CA license. The law requires that the request for the hearing be made within 10 calendar days from the date of arrest. Let us help you figure out your best next steps are. The sooner you have a plan of action, the better your chances of taking the correct steps to get the results you want. In addition, valuable evidence can be destroyed or lost if quick action is not taken following an arrest for driving under the influence. With over 30 years experience under his belt, Matt has the skills and knowledge to beat your DWI charge.

Matthew J Ruff Attorney at Law is a Torrance DUI Lawyer with over 30 years experience fighting drunk driving charges and DMV Hearings throughout California. If you are looking for a Top Tier Law Firm, we can help. If you are looking for a Santa Clarita DUI Attorney, we are here to fight for you.

Show Less

Matthew Ruff Wins 3rd Offense DUI in Redondo Beach

Defeating the Odds: How Top DUI Attorney Matthew Ruff Won a 3rd DUI, Resisting Arrest, and Refusal

Facing a single Driving Under the Influence (DUI) charge can disrupt your life, but facing a third DUI—compounded by a chemical test refusal enhancement and an additional charge for resisting arrest—is an absolute legal nightmare. In California, a third DUI conviction carries severe mandatory jail sentences, lengthy license revocations, and long-term financial devastation.

Yet, even when the cards seem completely stacked against the defense, a masterclass in constitutional law can completely turn the tide. Top Southern California DUI defense attorney Matthew Ruff recently achieved a stunning outcome for a client facing these exact charges, getting every single major count dismissed and resolving the entire case for a simple reckless driving charge.

Here is an inside look at how aggressive, strategic legal advocacy dismantled the prosecution’s case.

The Daunting Charges and High Stakes

The client was arrested by the Redondo Beach Police Department following a tip from a local establishment regarding a supposedly intoxicated patron. The prosecution ultimately filed a multi-count misdemeanor complaint including:

California Vehicle Code § 23152(a): Driving Under the Influence.

Refusal Enhancement Allegation (V.C. § 23577): Willfully refusing to submit to or complete a mandatory chemical test.

California Penal Code § 148(a)(1): Willfully resisting, delaying, or obstructing a peace officer.

Given the client’s prior record, the prosecution held immense leverage, and a conviction on these terms meant guaranteed jail time. However, a thorough evaluation of the police procedures revealed glaring constitutional violations.

The Turning Point: The Constitutional Blueprint for Dismissal

Attorney Matthew Ruff filed an aggressive Motion to Suppress Evidence (Penal Code § 1538.5), targeting the very foundation of the police investigation. The motion mapped out several critical errors made by law enforcement:

1. The Illegality of the Warrantless Driveway Entry

The police received a report and drove directly to the client's home address. Upon arrival, they entered the private driveway, walked up to a parked Mercedes SUV with the engine off, and used flashlights to look inside.

Ruff forcefully argued that under the Fourth Amendment and established U.S. Supreme Court precedent (Collins v. Virginia), a home’s driveway is considered part of its "curtilage"—the area immediately surrounding the home that enjoys the same strict privacy protections as the house itself. Because officers physically intruded onto private property to conduct a search and gather evidence without a warrant or exigent circumstances, the entry was presumptively unconstitutional.

2. Lack of Reasonable Suspicion & Immediate Observation

Before trespassing onto the property, officers never personally witnessed the client committing any traffic violations or operating the vehicle erratically. The client was simply sitting inside a legally parked vehicle on private property with the engine off. Because the initial contact and prolonged detention lacked a lawful, objective foundation of observed criminal activity, the defense argued the entire interaction was illegal from its inception.

3. A Flawed and Unreliable HGN "Test"

To justify the arrest, officers claimed they observed clues of impairment during a Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus (HGN) eye test performed while the client was leaning against a vehicle.

Ruff dismantled this in the motion, noting that the HGN test was administered in direct violation of standardized National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) protocols. When field sobriety tests depart from standard procedures, their results are inherently unreliable and cannot legally furnish the probable cause required for a lawful DUI arrest. Furthermore, no other standardized field sobriety tests were successfully completed, and the subjective markers used by the officers (like bloodshot eyes or alcohol odor) carried minimal probative value on their own.

The Ultimate Result: Major Counts Dismissed

Faced with a formidable Motion to Suppress that threatened to throw out all visual observations, statements, and evidence obtained on the property, the prosecution’s case began to crumble. Realizing their warrantless entry and flawed testing protocols exposed severe vulnerabilities, the state chose to negotiate rather than risk losing everything at a suppression hearing.

Through skilled negotiation, Matthew Ruff secured an extraordinary resolution:

The DUI charge was completely dismissed.

The Chemical Test Refusal allegation was dropped.

The Resisting Arrest charge was dismissed.

The entire case was resolved for a reckless driving charge, entirely sparing the client from mandatory jail time, a third DUI conviction on their record, and a devastating multi-year license revocation.

The Takeaway

This case serves as a powerful reminder that an arrest is not the same as a conviction. Even when a case seems open-and-shut to the police, the execution of the law matters. If law enforcement cuts corners, violates the Fourth Amendment, or fails to follow standard training procedures, an experienced Redondo Beach DUI defense attorney can dismantle the prosecution's leverage.

Winning Cases For 30 Years

Matthew Ruff Wins .30 BAC DUI Case

Case Study: How DUI Defense Master Matthew Ruff Beat a .30% BAC Charge

When the stakes are high, experience is your best defense.

Beating a Blood Alcohol Concentration (BAC) charge that is nearly four times the legal limit seems like an impossible task. However, top-tier DUI defense attorney Matthew Ruff proved once again that an arrest is not a conviction. By conducting a meticulous review of the state's evidence, Mr. Ruff successfully forced the California DMV to completely set aside the license suspension for his client.

Below is an analytical breakdown of how this remarkable legal victory was achieved, as documented in the official ruling shown above.

📋 Case Profile at a Glance

The Charge: Driving Under the Influence (California Vehicle Code Section 23152)

The Evidence: A submitted blood chemical test revealing a staggering 0.30% B.A.C.

The Defense Attorney: Matthew Ruff, Attorney at Law (Torrance CA)

The Outcome: Action Set Aside. The DMV could not uphold the suspension, legally ruling that the evidence failed to prove the client was driving at or above the 0.08% limit.

🛠️ The Winning Strategy: Dismantling the Chain of Custody

Many lawyers look at a .30% BAC printout and advise their clients to plead guilty. Matthew Ruff looked closer. He identified critical administrative flaws and technical errors made by law enforcement that rendered the entire chemical test untrustworthy.

According to the official findings of Driver Safety Officer R. Leask, Mr. Ruff successfully argued the following deficiencies:

1. The Typographical Blunder

The respondent's name was spelled incorrectly on vital paperwork, creating immediate legal ambiguity regarding who the blood sample actually belonged to.

2. Missing Sample Identification

The officer failed to provide the necessary ID of sample information on the CHP 202 form. Even though the test results were sworn, this omission broke the verifiable chain of custody.

3. Inability to Verify the Kit Number

Because of the missing documentation from Exhibit 1A, it was completely impossible to cross-reference the physical test kit with the final laboratory blood results.

The Driver Safety Officer's Explicit Ruling:

"With the same discrepancy and my lack of ability to cross-reference the sample and the blood results, and my failure to notice this deficiency prior to the hearing, the action must be set aside."

⚖️ The Final Verdict

Because Matthew Ruff exposed these deep-rooted administrative failures, the DMV was forced to issue the following definitive conclusion: The administrative action against the driver's license was completely dropped, saving the client from a devastating suspension despite the initial .30% BAC reading.

📞 Aggressive DUI Defense When You Need It Most

If you are facing a DUI charge in Southern California areas, do not leave your future to chance. Technicalities, procedural errors, and chain-of-custody mistakes happen every day—but it takes a master defender to find them and use them to your advantage.

Matthew Ruff Wins .30 BAC DUI

Matthew Wins Palos Verdes DUI

Palos Verdes Estates DUI Dropped

Case Victory: DUI Driver Safety License Suspension Set Aside in Palos Verdes

When faced with a DMV Administrative Per Se (APS) hearing, the stakes are incredibly high. A suspension can upend your personal and professional life. However, thanks to aggressive legal advocacy and diligent defense work, Palos Verdes DUI defense attorney Matthew Ruff has secured yet another major victory, completely setting aside a pending license suspension for a client in the Palos Verdes area.

The Incident and Allegations

The case began in the early morning hours of Christmas Eve, at approximately 1:46 AM, when an officer with the Palos Verdes Estates Police Department responded to a traffic collision. Following the accident, the responding officer alleged that the driver exhibited clear objective symptoms of intoxication, including:

Bloodshot and watery eyes

A strong odor of an alcoholic beverage

An unsteady gait and slurred speech

Unsatisfactory performance on Standardized Field Sobriety Tests (SFSTs)

The driver was subsequently arrested for driving under the influence and submitted to a chemical blood test at 3:04 AM.

The Defense Strategy: Holding the DMV to Its Burden of Proof

At a DMV Administrative Per Se hearing, the department carries the strict burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that the driver was operating a motor vehicle with a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) at or above 0.08%.

Recognizing gaps in the prosecution's evidence, defense attorney Matthew Ruff scrutinized the records submitted by the department. While the DMV presented the Officer’s Sworn Statement (DS-367) and the initial arrest report, Matthew Ruff successfully demonstrated a critical missing link: the department failed to introduce competent chemical blood test results to prove the driver’s actual BAC at the time of driving.

The Win: Total Order of Set Aside

Following the administrative hearing, Driver Safety Officer E. Nguyen issued an official Notification of Findings and Decision & Order of Set Aside.

The DMV’s official findings explicitly determined:

Matthew Ruff Top Rated California DUI Attorney

DUI Attorney Matthew Ruff Reaches Top 1% Status

Matthew Ruff Awarded “Top 1%” National Status

15 Minute Observation Defense Wins Case

Matthew Ruff Exposes Violation of Title 17, Wins DUI Case

My Blog

Matthew Beats DUI Cases!

Matthew Ruff Reviews

About Matthew Ruff

Matthew Ruff Has The Experience To Beat Your DUI

Matthew Ruff Has The Experience To Beat Your DUI

Matthew Ruff Has The Experience To Beat Your DUI

A Focus on Results

Matthew Ruff Has The Experience To Beat Your DUI

Matthew Ruff Has The Experience To Beat Your DUI

We Focus on Getting DUI Charges Dismissed!

Matthew Ruff Has The Experience To Beat Your DUI

We Focus on Getting DUI Charges Dismissed!

Matthew Ruff Wins 3rd Offense DUI in Redondo Beach

Defeating the Odds: How Top DUI Attorney Matthew Ruff Won a 3rd DUI, Resisting Arrest, and Refusal

Winning Cases For 30 Years

Matthew Ruff Wins .30 BAC DUI Case

Matthew Wins Palos Verdes DUI

Palos Verdes Estates DUI Dropped